Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 5GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Semp IS1421(CT1) (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel MPG-PDO Customer Reference Boards
Memory	1.2 GB free of 5 GB @ 0 GHz
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20050923
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 21 '19 at 19:06
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium M processor 1.60GHz 163 User benchmarks, average bench 25% U1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	21.9% Poor	Memory 42.2 1-Core 5 2-Core 8.2 16% 18.5 Pts	4-Core 13.1 8-Core 8.2 2% 10.6 Pts	64-Core 13.2 1% 13.2 Pts
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 21.9% Great: 32%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD WD800UE-22HCT0 80GB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 55GB free (System drive) Firmware: 09.07D09 SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.6 16 24 27 26 20 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	8.24% Terrible	Read 8.4 Write 7 Mixed 3.6 SusWrite 20.3 7% 9.82 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.2 30% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 8.24% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 5GB 14,654 User benchmarks, average bench 18% null MHz 2048, 3072 MB Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	6.26% Terrible	MC Read 2.1 MC Write 1.9 MC Mixed 2.1 6% 2.03 GB/s	SC Read 0.1 SC Write 0.4 SC Mixed 0.3 1% 0.27 GB/s	Latency 192 21% 192 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 6.26% Great: 34%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16