HP 500-524nl

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.31% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP 500-524nl  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2B35
Memory1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150210
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 21 '19 at 18:15
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-6700 APU (2013 D.Ri)-$130
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
57% Above average
Memory 80.8
1-Core 72.6
2-Core 107
56% 86.9 Pts
4-Core 195
8-Core 192
26% 194 Pts
64-Core 195
12% 195 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 57%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 240
Device(1B0A 90DF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.7.2
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
7.31% Terrible
Lighting 9.37
Reflection 8.12
Parallax 10.5
8% 9.34 fps
MRender 7.76
Gravity 7.97
Splatting 8.57
7% 8.1 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.31%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
807GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 97 94 104 94 113 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Read 90.1
Write 126
Mixed 49.3
SusWrite 99.4
67% 91.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A-PB HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21.5% Poor
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 3.7
MC Mixed 6.2
18% 6.47 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 7.2
19% 6.57 GB/s
Latency 79
51% 79 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback