Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (96th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 4 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics6.73% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemGigabyte H110M-H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161116
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 21 '19 at 13:48
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Memory 92.6
1-Core 134
2-Core 261
91% 162 Pts
4-Core 479
8-Core 712
74% 595 Pts
64-Core 712
44% 712 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7000
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
6.73% Terrible
Lighting 6.53
Reflection 10.3
Parallax 7.47
5% 8.09 fps
MRender 11.6
Gravity 6.83
Splatting 15
10% 11.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.73%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 142 141 143 131 144 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 449
Write 414
Mixed 345
SusWrite 162
77% 343 MB/s
4K Read 45.8
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 51.9
194% 69.2 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 309
DQ Mixed 168
174% 285 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 103%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMV4GX4M1A2133C15 859B CT8G4DFS824A.M8FH 12GB
2133, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.3% Very good
MC Read 28.4
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 21.5
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 24.5
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 62.9
64% 62.9 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H110M-H-CF Builds (Compare 3,496 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $98
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback