Foxconn 945 7AE Series

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 17%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardFoxconn 945 7AE Series  (all builds)
Memory1.1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20070106
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateAug 21 '19 at 13:03
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel 2140-$45
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Memory 69.6
1-Core 13.8
2-Core 36.1
30% 39.8 Pts
4-Core 36.3
8-Core 36.3
5% 36.3 Pts
64-Core 36.5
2% 36.5 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Asus(1043 85F7) 1GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
4.2% Terrible
Lighting 5
Reflection 4.46
Parallax 4.94
4% 4.8 fps
MRender 5.76
Gravity 3.93
Splatting 6.26
4% 5.32 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.2%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDT725025VLA380 250GB-$132
199GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V5DOA7EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 36 36 38 41 38 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
26.2% Poor
Read 53
Write 50.9
Mixed 33.1
SusWrite 37.6
32% 43.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.3
98% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
MC Read 4.6
MC Write 3.5
MC Mixed 3.7
11% 3.93 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 3
SC Mixed 3.7
11% 3.7 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback