MSI B360M GAMING PLUS (MS-7B19)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (95th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 5 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B19
MotherboardMSI B360M GAMING PLUS (MS-7B19)  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181009
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 21 '19 at 07:00
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8100-$110
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Memory 94.2
1-Core 116
2-Core 234
84% 148 Pts
4-Core 464
8-Core 438
61% 451 Pts
64-Core 463
29% 463 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1411 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.8.1
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 73.2
Reflection 73.2
Parallax 92.6
60% 79.7 fps
Gravity 74.3
Splatting 58.5
58% 66.4 fps
Poor: 46% Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB-$105
361GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41110WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 450 380 302 300 297 295 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 476
Mixed 342
SusWrite 337
93% 414 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 94.5
4K Mixed 45.5
162% 58.6 MB/s
DQ Read 342
DQ Write 287
DQ Mixed 245
202% 291 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 105%
Great: 108%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
915GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 192 192 193 195 194 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 178
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 193
105% 146 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
171% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 110%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB-$31
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
MC Read 30.2
MC Write 31.8
MC Mixed 24.4
82% 28.8 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 30.8
SC Mixed 26.1
71% 25 GB/s
Latency 59.2
68% 59.2 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B360M GAMING PLUS (MS-7B19) Builds (Compare 1,467 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: MSI B360M GAMING PLUS (MS-7B19)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $405
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback