Gigabyte GA-F2A58M-DS2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.94% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A58M-DS2  (all builds)
Memory8.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140506
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 21 '19 at 02:23
Run Duration97 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7650K APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Memory 71.6
1-Core 60.4
2-Core 110
50% 80.8 Pts
4-Core 192
8-Core 191
26% 191 Pts
64-Core 191
12% 191 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
AMD(1002 0123) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.301.1001.0
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
5.94% Terrible
Lighting 7.33
Reflection 8.85
Parallax 9.53
6% 8.57 fps
MRender 6.67
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 7.43
6% 7.13 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.94%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 145
Write 83.3
Mixed 72
22% 100 MB/s
4K Read 10.6
4K Write 16.1
4K Mixed 10
37% 12.2 MB/s
DQ Read 9.8
DQ Write 20.9
DQ Mixed 17
12% 15.9 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 85%
WD VelociRaptor 500GB-$62
314GB free
Firmware: 02.04E.A
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 112
Write 106
Mixed 69.8
71% 95.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.3
233% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 61% Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown U3A4G93-16GBH Kingston 16JTF1G64AZ-1 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
36.8% Below average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 8.7
MC Mixed 14.7
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 9.8
24% 8.3 GB/s
Latency 97.7
41% 97.7 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A58M-DS2 Builds (Compare 82 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A58M-DS2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $81
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback