Lenovo 80JG

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemLenovo 80JG  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lenovo S435
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit barev, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141021
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 26 '16 at 22:37
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-6310 APU R4 Graphics
Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
38% Below average
Memory 57.2
1-Core 34.2
2-Core 64.6
34% 52 Pts
4-Core 112
8-Core 110
15% 111 Pts
64-Core 114
7% 114 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 38%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R4
Legend(17AA 3805) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1065.0
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.05% Terrible
Lighting 2.23
Reflection 5.04
Parallax 3.16
2% 3.48 fps
MRender 3.24
Gravity 2.17
Splatting 3.57
2% 2.99 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.05%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
67% Good
Read 467
Write 367
Mixed 393
91% 409 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 36.3
4K Mixed 16
82% 26.8 MB/s
DQ Read 30.5
DQ Write 41.5
DQ Mixed 15.8
18% 29.3 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 67%
Great: 124%
Kingston HyperX Savage USB 3.1 256GB-$126
179GB free, PID 16b3
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
60.2% Good
Read 193
Write 133
Mixed 150
195% 159 MB/s
4K Read 4.07
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.46
55% 1.74 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905428-401.A00LF 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19.3% Very poor
MC Read 8.1
MC Write 4.1
MC Mixed 7
18% 6.4 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 7
16% 5.7 GB/s
Latency 136
29% 136 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback