Lenovo 20NE001GMH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive153% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20NE001GMH  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20NE001GMH
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190404
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateAug 20 '19 at 20:19
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
65.9% Good
Memory 69.8
1-Core 106
2-Core 207
71% 128 Pts
4-Core 334
8-Core 501
52% 417 Pts
64-Core 505
31% 505 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Legend(17AA 5124) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.8.1
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Lighting 12.3
Reflection 11.8
Parallax 15.7
10% 13.3 fps
MRender 6.76
Gravity 13.3
Splatting 16.7
10% 12.2 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM512GDHTNG-8710B 512GB
420GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80010C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 718 712 702 719 718 704 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
153% Outstanding
Read 964
Write 336
Mixed 162
SusWrite 712
120% 544 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 43.9
4K Mixed 47.1
110% 36.2 MB/s
DQ Read 816
DQ Write 731
DQ Mixed 607
501% 718 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 153%
Great: 171%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43DB1-CTD 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
44.6% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 13.9
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 15.9
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback