HP Presario CQ56 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 12.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemHP Presario CQ56 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1604
Memory2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100914
Uptime1 Days
Run DateOct 26 '16 at 18:52
Run Duration270 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD V140
Socket S1G4, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12.7% Very poor
Memory 21.6
1-Core 14.3
2-Core 19.2
13% 18.4 Pts
4-Core 22.4
8-Core 26.2
3% 24.3 Pts
64-Core 8.6
0% 8.6 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 37%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST320LM001 HN-M320MBB 320GB
284GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AR10002 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
40.9% Average
Read 70.2
Write 72.4
Mixed 60.8
51% 67.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.17
4K Write 1.16
4K Mixed 0.15
46% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 51%
SanDisk Cruzer Switch 64GB
26GB free, PID 5572
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Read 22
Write 12.4
Mixed 14.1
19% 16.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.64
4K Write 1.36
4K Mixed 1.04
91% 1.68 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 14%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AD73I1B1674EU AM1U139C2P1-B10S 4GB
1066, 1066 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
8.16% Terrible
MC Read 1.7
MC Write 2
MC Mixed 3.6
7% 2.43 GB/s
SC Read 3.5
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 3.3
10% 3.57 GB/s
Latency 309
13% 309 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 8.16%
Great: 22%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Presario CQ56 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 58 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 17%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: HP Presario CQ56 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback