Acer Aspire 4736Z

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire 4736Z  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire 4736Z
Memory2.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090330
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 19 '19 at 14:03
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium T4200-$99
uPGA-478, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
20.6% Poor
Memory 36.6
1-Core 7.5
2-Core 11.3
15% 18.5 Pts
4-Core 29.3
8-Core 24.6
4% 27 Pts
64-Core 2.6
0% 2.6 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family
Acer(1025 0260)
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.34% Terrible
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 0.35
Parallax 0.41
0% 0.38 fps
MRender 0.43
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 0.52
0% 0.45 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.34%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor PX-256M8VC 256GB
172GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 147 154 162 142 145 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.1% Below average
Read 173
Write 178
Mixed 149
SusWrite 147
36% 162 MB/s
4K Read 10.4
4K Write 17
4K Mixed 13.4
42% 13.6 MB/s
DQ Read 106
DQ Write 76.3
DQ Mixed 81.7
64% 87.9 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 115%
Multiple Card Reader 16GB
3GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.7 17 17 15 17 17 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
9.12% Terrible
Read 27.2
Write 11.8
Mixed 15.9
SusWrite 15.2
22% 17.5 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.8
51% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 9.12%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
10.3% Very poor
MC Read 4
MC Write 3.4
MC Mixed 3.3
10% 3.57 GB/s
SC Read 1.3
SC Write 1.9
SC Mixed 2.5
5% 1.9 GB/s
Latency 219
18% 219 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire 4736Z Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire 4736Z

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 31% - Below average Total price: $180
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback