Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	7.47% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7820HQ 15,851 User benchmarks, average bench 63% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	73.3% Very good	Memory 71.6 1-Core 107 2-Core 222 73% 134 Pts	4-Core 404 8-Core 595 62% 499 Pts	64-Core 577 36% 577 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? HP(103C 8275) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6472 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	7.47% Terrible	Lighting 7.73 Reflection 23.2 Parallax 7.84 6% 12.9 fps	MRender 11.5 Gravity 7.1 Splatting 15.7 10% 11.4 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 7.47% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLW512HMJP-000H7 512GB 850 User benchmarks, average bench 194% 54GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXY70H7Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,041 Write 929 Mixed 645 194% 872 MB/s	4K Read 45.7 4K Write 106 4K Mixed 50.8 190% 67.5 MB/s	DQ Read 877 DQ Write 762 DQ Mixed 801 605% 813 MB/s
Poor: 126% Great: 245%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CRC 2x16GB 7,581 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	76.6% Very good	MC Read 27.4 MC Write 30.6 MC Mixed 24.7 79% 27.6 GB/s	SC Read 16.2 SC Write 31.9 SC Mixed 24 69% 24 GB/s	Latency 97.6 41% 97.6 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 76.6% Great: 82%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	439x
Quadro M2200NvidiaBench 19%, 2,904 samples	195x
Quadro M1200NvidiaBench 15%, 4,250 samples	148x

SSD
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 238%, 21,542 samples	157x
MZVLW512HMJP-000H7 512GBSamsungBench 194%, 850 samples	63x
MTFDDAV512TBN-1AR15ABHA 512GBCrucialBench 78%, 710 samples	62x

RAM
HMA82GS6AFR8N-UH 1x16GBHynixBench 40%, 22,543 samples	72x
M471A2K43CB1-CRC 1x16GBSamsungBench 40%, 36,753 samples	62x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 71,691 samples	48x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16