Gigabyte GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI-50-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics48.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive223% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI-50
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI-50-CF  (all builds)
Memory28.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190722
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 19 '19 at 11:11
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
91.8% Outstanding
Memory 71.1
1-Core 154
2-Core 306
93% 177 Pts
4-Core 602
8-Core 1,122
103% 862 Pts
64-Core 1,480
92% 1,480 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1268 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
48.8% Average
Lighting 60.8
Reflection 65.9
Parallax 77.9
50% 68.2 fps
MRender 64.1
Gravity 58
Splatting 53.6
47% 58.6 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 512GB
437GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM12.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 647 582 579 583 634 582 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
223% Outstanding
Read 1,432
Write 2,021
Mixed 1528
SusWrite 601
315% 1,396 MB/s
4K Read 43.2
4K Write 164
4K Mixed 60
229% 89 MB/s
DQ Read 1,364
DQ Write 1,320
DQ Mixed 1,294
985% 1,326 MB/s
Poor: 112%
This bench: 223%
Great: 291%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$90
107GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 75 77 76 75 77 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
43.3% Average
Read 74.3
Write 78.2
Mixed 53.1
SusWrite 76
52% 70.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 96%
I-O DATA HDCR-U 2TB
190GB free, PID 012e
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
9.58% Terrible
Read 34.8
Write 31.7
Mixed 20
SusWrite 14.4
32% 25.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
30% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.58%
Great: 18%
I-O DATA HDH-USR 250GB
26GB free, PID 0116
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
11% Very poor
Read 36.3
Write 11.3
Mixed 20.8
SusWrite 14.4
25% 20.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
53% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11%
Great: 19%
I-O DATA HDCS-U 1TB
3GB free, PID 0121
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 14 14 15 14 14 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Read 36
Write 23.3
Mixed 32.5
SusWrite 14.4
34% 26.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.9% Good
MC Read 28.6
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 27.4
70% 24.6 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 27.2
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 98.8
40% 98.8 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI-50-CF Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI-50-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 31% - Below average Total price: $1,056
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback