bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics31.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
System
MotherboardIntel DQ57TM
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111207
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 19 '19 at 03:40
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$339
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Memory 93.8
1-Core 84.1
2-Core 161
69% 113 Pts
4-Core 262
8-Core 360
39% 311 Pts
64-Core 354
22% 354 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
31.7% Below average
Lighting 39.7
Reflection 30.7
Parallax 37.6
32% 36 fps
MRender 38.6
Gravity 37.6
Splatting 36
30% 37.4 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
235GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 212 210 214 214 213 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
56.7% Above average
Read 240
Write 227
Mixed 228
SusWrite 212
51% 227 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 43.4
4K Mixed 23.8
85% 29.3 MB/s
DQ Read 176
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 159
125% 172 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 129%
ST6000AS0002-1N917X 6TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: AR17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 113 114 114 114 125 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Read 99.6
Write 123
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 115
22% 99.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 9.8
4K Mixed 0.9
7% 3.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1.8
DQ Write 10.8
DQ Mixed 3.2
3% 5.27 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 19%
Seagate ST3160318AS 160GB-$43
16GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 63 63 64 64 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
35.3% Below average
Read 58.8
Write 58.9
Mixed 46.8
SusWrite 63.9
42% 57.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 58%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$59
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX4OAC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 147 151 150 151 151 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
86% Excellent
Read 150
Write 147
Mixed 21.8
SusWrite 149
84% 117 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.6
151% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 86%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M378B5773CH0-CH9 M378B5773CH0-CH9 M378B5773DH0-CH9 M378B5773CH0-CH9 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
39.8% Below average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 12.8
MC Mixed 10.9
37% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 11.3
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 60.4
66% 60.4 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,302 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback