HP Compaq 8100 Elite CMT PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP Compaq 8100 Elite CMT PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 304Bh
Memory4.7 GB free of 8.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091216
Uptime62 Days
Run DateAug 18 '19 at 21:44
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 660
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.45 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
43.1% Average
Memory 59.3
1-Core 26
2-Core 43
30% 42.8 Pts
4-Core 151
8-Core 188
22% 170 Pts
64-Core 198
12% 198 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)
HP(103C 304B) 3.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.9% Terrible
Lighting 0.97
Reflection 1.19
Parallax 0.88
1% 1.01 fps
MRender 1.33
Gravity 0.73
Splatting 1.83
1% 1.3 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.9%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$25
418GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03.03B03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 99 91 97 100 103 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 96.5
Write 101
Mixed 54.4
SusWrite 99.1
64% 87.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 ID:80 2C 16JTF25664AZ-1G4F ID:80 AD HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 ID:80 2C 16JTF25664AZ-1G4F 44GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 36864 MB
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
27.3% Poor
MC Read 9
MC Write 8.6
MC Mixed 12.5
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 5
14% 5.03 GB/s
Latency 130
31% 130 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 8100 Elite CMT PC Builds (Compare 660 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8100 Elite CMT PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $98
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback