Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics42% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive222% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI  (all builds)
Memory28.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190731
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 18 '19 at 16:44
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 49%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$175
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Memory 83.6
1-Core 123
2-Core 234
82% 147 Pts
4-Core 427
8-Core 660
67% 544 Pts
64-Core 768
48% 768 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
Gigabyte(1458 37C1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.60
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42% Average
Lighting 47.4
Reflection 54.8
Parallax 44.5
39% 48.9 fps
MRender 68
Gravity 47.6
Splatting 62
49% 59.2 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 42%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
279GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 986 1032 859 795 801 799 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
222% Outstanding
Read 1,320
Write 1,056
Mixed 1,069
SusWrite 878
243% 1,081 MB/s
4K Read 60.3
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 74.5
243% 80.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,018
DQ Write 783
DQ Mixed 884
666% 895 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 222%
Great: 355%
Kingston SUV500240G 240GB
223GB free
Firmware: 003056RI
SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 118 118 117 108 117 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
85% Excellent
Read 471
Write 472
Mixed 378
SusWrite 144
82% 366 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 72.7
4K Mixed 41.4
145% 49.8 MB/s
DQ Read 313
DQ Write 251
DQ Mixed 172
159% 246 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 85%
Great: 89%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
912GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 193 190 190 194 192 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 192
Write 182
Mixed 82.3
SusWrite 192
118% 162 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 110%
Great: 113%
JetFlash Transcend 32GB
29GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 4.8 4 4.4 4.8 4.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
4.33% Terrible
Read 12
Write 6.2
Mixed 12.3
SusWrite 4.4
11% 8.73 MB/s
4K Read 6.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
26% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.33%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D32AESEK.M8FE 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 41.8
MC Write 34.1
MC Mixed 37.6
108% 37.8 GB/s
SC Read 21.8
SC Write 30.7
SC Mixed 28.7
77% 27.1 GB/s
Latency 74.2
54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 102%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 1,029 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI - $276

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $1,090
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback