Asrock N68C-GS FX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 43%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive19.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock N68C-GS FX  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121031
Uptime3.5 Days
Run DateAug 18 '19 at 10:29
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 280
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
43% Average
Memory 68.3
1-Core 53.6
2-Core 106
47% 76 Pts
4-Core 106
8-Core 106
14% 106 Pts
64-Core 105
6% 105 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 43%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450
Elitegroup(1019 0006) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.18% Terrible
Lighting 1.37
Reflection 2
Parallax 1.66
1% 1.67 fps
MRender 1.86
Gravity 0.83
Splatting 1.96
1% 1.55 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.18%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 92 97 91 84 85 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
19.7% Very poor
Read 109
Write 71.3
Mixed 55.1
SusWrite 88
18% 80.8 MB/s
4K Read 8.8
4K Write 15.3
4K Mixed 7.5
31% 10.5 MB/s
DQ Read 9.5
DQ Write 15.4
DQ Mixed 11.3
9% 12.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 100%
Hitachi HCS5C1010CLA 1TB
914GB free
Firmware: JC4O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 112 115 116 115 117 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
67.2% Good
Read 120
Write 113
Mixed 50
SusWrite 115
72% 99.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 0009099295 00F 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2 266 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
19.9% Very poor
MC Read 6.6
MC Write 6.2
MC Mixed 6.4
18% 6.4 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 5.3
16% 5.6 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 24%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68C-GS FX Builds (Compare 155 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68C-GS FX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $118
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback