Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 127%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive332% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 AORUS PRO  (all builds)
Memory28.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190802
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 18 '19 at 00:05
Run Duration322 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$200
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Memory 82
1-Core 152
2-Core 301
96% 178 Pts
4-Core 599
8-Core 1,058
100% 829 Pts
64-Core 1,464
91% 1,464 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Lighting 181
Reflection 196
Parallax 174
148% 184 fps
MRender 121
Gravity 173
Splatting 119
111% 138 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 128%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
380GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2329 836 834 828 827 829 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
332% Outstanding
Read 2,696
Write 2,401
Mixed 1,948
SusWrite 1,080
454% 2,031 MB/s
4K Read 70.8
4K Write 187
4K Mixed 99.3
334% 119 MB/s
DQ Read 1,323
DQ Write 1,138
DQ Mixed 1,242
927% 1,234 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 332%
Great: 355%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
97GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 295 295 294 295 295 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 448
Mixed 412
SusWrite 313
94% 417 MB/s
4K Read 42.7
4K Write 92.2
4K Mixed 56
185% 63.6 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 200
150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 106%
Great: 124%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
208GB free
Firmware: M3CR020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 433 435 433 433 432 434 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 419
Mixed 384
SusWrite 433
98% 434 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 90
4K Mixed 50.1
165% 58.4 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 185
143% 195 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 107%
Great: 125%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
366GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 455 452 450 450 451 449 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 445
Mixed 424
SusWrite 451
102% 453 MB/s
4K Read 42.7
4K Write 94.7
4K Mixed 57.3
188% 64.9 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 200
150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 115%
Great: 134%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
124GB free
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 635 320 319 318 318 318 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
220% Outstanding
Read 2,036
Write 1446
Mixed 625
SusWrite 371
247% 1,119 MB/s
4K Read 45.1
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 56.2
220% 83.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,062
DQ Write 1,165
DQ Mixed 809
693% 1,012 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 220%
Great: 236%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$100
2TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 136 139 140 142 144 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Read 155
Write 141
Mixed 94.5
SusWrite 140
98% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
188% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2Z3200C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
MC Read 38.7
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 38.5
99% 34.8 GB/s
SC Read 26.2
SC Write 26.6
SC Mixed 36.6
85% 29.8 GB/s
Latency 76.9
52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS PRO Builds (Compare 1,967 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 181%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $1,152
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback