Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	83.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4210H 12,540 User benchmarks, average bench 55% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	49.7% Average	Memory 81.3 1-Core 73.6 2-Core 138 60% 97.7 Pts	4-Core 118 8-Core 63.2 13% 90.6 Pts	64-Core 105 6% 105 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 49.7% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Legend(17AA 3978) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	0.77% Terrible	Lighting 0.77 Reflection 3.38 Parallax 1.22 1% 1.79 fps	MRender 1.76 Gravity 0.53 Splatting 1.48 1% 1.26 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 0.77% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130 75,831 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 173GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 313 222 219 226 233 217 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	83.1% Excellent	Read 400 Write 406 Mixed 280 SusWrite 238 74% 331 MB/s	4K Read 25.3 4K Write 80.5 4K Mixed 40.4 133% 48.7 MB/s	DQ Read 266 DQ Write 227 DQ Mixed 248 185% 247 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 83.1% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT102464BF160B.C16 Samsung M471B1G73BH0-YK0 16GB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	34.9% Below average	MC Read 10.8 MC Write 14.2 MC Mixed 13.2 36% 12.7 GB/s	SC Read 4.2 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 6 15% 5.13 GB/s	Latency 78.2 51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 34.9% Great: 57%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	1,798x
GTX 860MNvidiaBench 16%, 18,736 samples	630x
GTX 960MNvidiaBench 16%, 73,363 samples	407x

SSD
MZ7TE512HMHP-000 512GBSamsungBench 75%, 3,033 samples	136x
MZ7TE256HMHP-000L2 256GBSamsungBench 69%, 2,145 samples	128x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	102x

RAM
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 53%, 30,591 samples	420x
RMT3160ME68FAF1600 2x8GBRamaxelBench 52%, 3,672 samples	237x
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 52%, 34,976 samples	224x