Asrock K10N78

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 15% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	33.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock K10N78 (all builds)
Memory	5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100701
Uptime	11.2 Days
Run Date	Oct 25 '16 at 16:22
Run Duration	121 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83 41,403 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	55% Above average	Memory 78.5 1-Core 46.9 2-Core 93.7 47% 73 Pts	4-Core 184 8-Core 185 25% 185 Pts	64-Core 163 10% 163 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 55% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 280-$185 33,175 User benchmarks, average bench 30% MSI(1462 277C) 3GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 20.19.0.32837 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	33.7% Below average	Lighting 43.5 Reflection 31.5 Parallax 53.6 36% 42.9 fps	MRender 29.9 Gravity 40.4 Splatting 39 30% 36.5 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 34%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 128GB-$74 9,892 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 27GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	45.2% Average	Read 205 Write 182 Mixed 192 43% 193 MB/s	4K Read 23.5 4K Write 52.1 4K Mixed 15 82% 30.2 MB/s	DQ Read 22.2 DQ Write 52 DQ Mixed 14.9 18% 29.7 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 45.2% Great: 89%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 547GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	62.1% Good	Read 139 Write 77.1 Mixed 106 81% 107 MB/s	4K Read 1.56 4K Write 0.96 4K Mixed 0.21 106% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	27.4% Poor	MC Read 10.2 MC Write 7.6 MC Mixed 9.9 26% 9.23 GB/s	SC Read 5.9 SC Write 5.4 SC Mixed 7.5 18% 6.27 GB/s	Latency 83.5 48% 83.5 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 27.4% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical K10N78 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

Motherboard: Asrock K10N78

CPU
Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)AMDBench 40%, 19,471 samples	1x
Athlon II X4 640AMD $70Bench 45%, 18,839 samples	1x
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5400+AMDBench 38%, 956 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 650-TiNvidia $152Bench 14%, 36,698 samples	1x
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	1x
GeForce 8200NvidiaBench 0%, 1,005 samples	1x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	1x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	1x
3x2GBUnknownBench 30%, 45,030 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $152

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asrock K10N78

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asrock K10N78

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)