Sony VPCCW2GGX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemSony VPCCW2GGX  (all builds)
MotherboardSony VAIO
Memory3.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100514
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateAug 17 '19 at 10:43
Run Duration233 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 M 350-$199
N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.25 GHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
42.4% Average
Memory 61.8
1-Core 56.2
2-Core 91.7
44% 69.9 Pts
4-Core 135
8-Core 138
18% 136 Pts
64-Core 141
9% 141 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 310M
Sony(104D 9072) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 341.95
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
0.62% Terrible
Lighting 0.03
Reflection 3.04
Parallax 0.53
0% 1.2 fps
MRender 3.43
Gravity 0.97
Splatting 2.17
2% 2.19 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.62%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK5059GSX 500GB
218GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GK00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 50 54 59 57 58 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
32.7% Below average
Read 59.3
Write 60.9
Mixed 19.4
SusWrite 54.2
35% 48.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 42%
WD My Book Essentials 1TB
71GB free, PID 1110
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.8 9.9 9.7 9.7 9.9 9.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
9.93% Terrible
Read 25.2
Write 20
Mixed 20.2
SusWrite 9.8
24% 18.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
67% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.93%
Great: 20%
WD My Book Essentials 1TB
161GB free, PID 1110
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.8 9.7 9.8 9.8 9.7 9.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Read 26.4
Write 21.2
Mixed 21
SusWrite 9.8
25% 19.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 20%
WD My Book Essentials 1TB
290GB free, PID 1110
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.8 9.9 9.9 9.8 9.8 9.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
10.8% Very poor
Read 27.3
Write 21.2
Mixed 19.7
SusWrite 9.8
25% 19.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
77% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 20%
Seagate Desktop 1TB
606GB free, PID 3300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.9 10 10 9.9 9.9 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
9.72% Terrible
Read 25.6
Write 20.9
Mixed 18.7
SusWrite 9.9
24% 18.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
74% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 9.72%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
23.9% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 9.9
24% 8.23 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 6.6
18% 6.2 GB/s
Latency 123
33% 123 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VPCCW2GGX Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Sony VPCCW2GGX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $199
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback