ECT One Computer Core i7-6700K, 4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemECT One Computer Core i7-6700K, 4  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING II
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190527
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 16 '19 at 21:26
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600K-$137
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
99.1% Outstanding
Memory 95.6
1-Core 145
2-Core 284
97% 175 Pts
4-Core 552
8-Core 830
86% 691 Pts
64-Core 823
51% 823 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Lighting 139
Reflection 130
Parallax 137
113% 135 fps
MRender 179
Gravity 131
Splatting 104
109% 138 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 109%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
122GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,658
Write 2,212
Mixed 1,225
449% 2,032 MB/s
4K Read 60.9
4K Write 189
4K Mixed 85.9
302% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 1,467
DQ Write 1,398
DQ Mixed 1,470
1,094% 1,445 MB/s
Poor: 195% Great: 393%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
613GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 156 157 158 158 158 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 192
Write 106
Mixed 93.5
SusWrite 157
101% 137 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
231% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 100%
Great: 109%
Intenso External USB 3.0 3TB
286GB free, PID 0579
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 78 79 79 77 80 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
39.1% Below average
Read 119
Write 110
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 77.7
122% 93.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.2
62% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 39%
Seagate Expansion 1.5TB
91GB free, PID 2322
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 93 94 95 93 77 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
28.1% Poor
Read 18.5
Write 15.8
Mixed 31.2
SusWrite 90.5
58% 39 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
MC Read 38.1
MC Write 36.1
MC Mixed 26.7
96% 33.6 GB/s
SC Read 20.6
SC Write 34.6
SC Mixed 28.8
80% 28 GB/s
Latency 55.3
72% 55.3 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical One Computer Core i7-6700K, 4 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier

System: ECT One Computer Core i7-6700K, 4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $443
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback