Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (2nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 98 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 17.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	51.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Supermicro SYS-5038MD-H24TRF-OS012 (all builds)
Motherboard	Supermicro X10SDE-DF
Memory	30.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20180613
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 16 '19 at 20:04
Run Duration	188 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon D-1531 13 User benchmarks, average bench 63% CPU1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 0.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	17.6% Very poor	Memory 30.2 1-Core 7.2 2-Core 14.2 13% 17.2 Pts	4-Core 27.9 8-Core 39.8 4% 33.8 Pts	64-Core 47.3 3% 47.3 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 73%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK512TBN 512GB 2,512 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 455GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0MU031 SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 327 330 227 209 207 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	51.8% Above average	Read 303 Write 316 Mixed 260 SusWrite 271 65% 287 MB/s	4K Read 14.7 4K Write 27.2 4K Mixed 18.3 60% 20.1 MB/s	DQ Read 99.9 DQ Write 98.2 DQ Mixed 105 77% 101 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 101%
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK512TBN 512GB 2,512 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 477GB free Firmware: M0MU031 SusWrite @10s intervals: 329 327 331 320 319 313 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	54.7% Above average	Read 285 Write 341 Mixed 273 SusWrite 323 69% 306 MB/s	4K Read 15.1 4K Write 27.6 4K Mixed 18.3 61% 20.3 MB/s	DQ Read 104 DQ Write 102 DQ Mixed 106 79% 104 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 54.7% Great: 101%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 18ADF2G72AZ-2G6H1R 2x16GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	6.97% Terrible	MC Read 2.3 MC Write 2.3 MC Mixed 1.9 6% 2.17 GB/s	SC Read 1.4 SC Write 2.2 SC Mixed 2.1 5% 1.9 GB/s	Latency 253 16% 253 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 6.97% Great: 93%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16