Gigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 134%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics164% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive116% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 7  (all builds)
Memory25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190322
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateAug 16 '19 at 17:35
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 29%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Memory 90.2
1-Core 109
2-Core 245
82% 148 Pts
4-Core 468
8-Core 772
76% 620 Pts
64-Core 1,131
70% 1,131 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Gigabyte(1458 37BE) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
164% Outstanding
Lighting 229
Reflection 232
Parallax 256
187% 239 fps
MRender 260
Gravity 225
Splatting 145
165% 210 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 164%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
118GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 279 179 182 179 175 174 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 483
Mixed 413
SusWrite 195
89% 398 MB/s
4K Read 45.1
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 62.8
218% 79.3 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 359
270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 116%
Great: 124%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$74
518GB free
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1461 1468 1223 103 248 100 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
226% Outstanding
Read 1,454
Write 1,524
Mixed 1,067
SusWrite 767
270% 1,203 MB/s
4K Read 58.1
4K Write 169
4K Mixed 79.7
279% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 627
DQ Write 916
DQ Mixed 271
345% 605 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 226%
Great: 255%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
774GB free
Firmware: MS2OA7L0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 155 155 160 163 159 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Read 149
Write 154
Mixed 34.3
SusWrite 154
89% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
118% 1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ABA300 3TB
2TB free
Firmware: MZ6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 125 131 134 133 133 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Read 114
Write 133
Mixed 22.7
SusWrite 131
72% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
133% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 88%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$64
710GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 50 52 51 51 49 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
39.1% Below average
Read 85.2
Write 76.5
Mixed 52
SusWrite 50.7
49% 66.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3000C16-8GTZR 04CD F4-2133C15-8GVR 04CD F4-3000C16-8GTZR 04CD F4-2133C15-8GVR 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
70.3% Very good
MC Read 25
MC Write 26.2
MC Mixed 22.4
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 27.4
SC Mixed 22.1
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 66.9
60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 3,970 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 7 - $221

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $1,049
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback