Asrock 990FX Extreme6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics35.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive120% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 990FX Extreme6  (all builds)
Memory4.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160114
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 15 '19 at 20:25
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8370-$175
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
64.3% Good
Memory 83.6
1-Core 72.9
2-Core 145
61% 101 Pts
4-Core 244
8-Core 403
40% 324 Pts
64-Core 413
26% 413 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
MSI(1462 3201) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Lighting 46.5
Reflection 43.4
Parallax 39.2
38% 43 fps
MRender 39
Gravity 40.7
Splatting 35.4
31% 38.4 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$31
141GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW7300Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 442 453 483 502 461 496 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 707
Write 558
Mixed 455
SusWrite 473
123% 548 MB/s
4K Read 38.9
4K Write 72.6
4K Mixed 45.2
155% 52.2 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 293
DQ Mixed 345
254% 336 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 120%
Great: 243%
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$39
386GB free
Firmware: X41100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 366 346 282 267 282 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Read 479
Write 398
Mixed 328
SusWrite 317
85% 380 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 61.7
4K Mixed 36.6
125% 42.8 MB/s
DQ Read 274
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 221
175% 244 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 108%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$120
3TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 118 121 119 116 124 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
72% Very good
Read 131
Write 128
Mixed 76.5
SusWrite 120
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 72%
Great: 87%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
620GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 70 75 73 69 76 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
42.4% Average
Read 74.5
Write 66.9
Mixed 71.1
SusWrite 73.1
53% 71.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
123% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 59%
Generic- SD/MMC 4GB
3GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5 5.6 5.1 5.8 4.8 5.9 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
3.99% Terrible
Read 15.8
Write 2
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 5.4
7% 6.92 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.99%
Great: 9%
SanDisk Ultra 123GB
108GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 159
Write 71.7
Mixed 72.1
112% 101 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.5
137% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
26.9% Poor
MC Read 9
MC Write 8.4
MC Mixed 7.9
24% 8.43 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 7.6
SC Mixed 7.8
23% 8.07 GB/s
Latency 74.1
54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 990FX Extreme6 Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Extreme6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $260
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $64
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback