Acer AOA150

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago.
SystemAcer AOA150  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer
Memory0.9 GB free of 1.5 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display800 x 600 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080509
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 14 '19 at 19:40
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User VEN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Atom N270
CPU, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
21% Poor
Memory 40.2
1-Core 9.8
2-Core 14.2
17% 21.4 Pts
4-Core 12.2
8-Core 15.1
2% 13.6 Pts
64-Core 13.7
1% 13.7 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 21%
Great: 31%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 160GB (2009)-$30
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11.01A11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 26 30 32 28 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Read 23.1
Write 21.5
Mixed 18.3
SusWrite 29.4
17% 23.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
109% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 36%
SanDisk U3 Cruzer Micro 4GB
1GB free, PID 5406
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 4.3 4.2 4.1 4.9 4.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
3.56% Terrible
Read 14.2
Write 2.6
Mixed 2.6
SusWrite 4.2
6% 5.9 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
9% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 3.56%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 1GB
null MHz
512, 1024 MB
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
5.76% Terrible
MC Read 0.9
MC Write 2.3
MC Mixed 1.6
5% 1.6 GB/s
SC Read 0.9
SC Write 2.1
SC Mixed 1.2
4% 1.4 GB/s
Latency 201
20% 201 ns
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.76%
Great: 17%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $46
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback