Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive72.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 6  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190502
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 13 '19 at 19:43
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100F-$115
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Memory 93
1-Core 132
2-Core 260
90% 162 Pts
4-Core 511
8-Core 516
69% 513 Pts
64-Core 515
32% 515 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Lighting 133
Reflection 138
Parallax 117
108% 129 fps
MRender 98
Gravity 130
Splatting 106
91% 111 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 102%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1Z40102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 355 410 398 228 230 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
72.4% Very good
Read 435
Write 378
Mixed 379
SusWrite 324
85% 379 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 40.3
4K Mixed 18.8
76% 26.5 MB/s
DQ Read 226
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 40.3
96% 196 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 100%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
41GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 342 381 435 426 423 425 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Read 446
Write 420
Mixed 372
SusWrite 405
92% 411 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 47.6
4K Mixed 30.4
102% 34.4 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 351
264% 354 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 134%
SanDisk Cruzer Fit 32GB
25GB free, PID 5571
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.6 2.9 3.6 4.1 4.1 4.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
5.58% Terrible
Read 20.5
Write 14.5
Mixed 15.7
SusWrite 3.5
17% 13.6 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.6
44% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.58%
Great: 14%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT4G4DFS8213.C8FAR 859B BLS4G4D26BFSB.8FBD2 859B CT4G4DFS8213.C8FAR 859B BLS4G4D26BFSB.8FBD2 16GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
77.2% Very good
MC Read 28
MC Write 29.1
MC Mixed 24.4
78% 27.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 29.9
SC Mixed 22.8
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 62.1
64% 62.1 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z390 Phantom Gaming 6 Builds (Compare 349 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 111% - Outstanding Total price: $634
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback