HP Z400 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics43.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP Z400 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0B4Ch
Memory29.4 GB free of 32.002 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160224
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateAug 13 '19 at 06:24
Run Duration106 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5680
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
72.9% Very good
Memory 83.2
1-Core 84.7
2-Core 168
66% 112 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 565
55% 451 Pts
64-Core 645
40% 645 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P2000
Nvidia(10DE 11B3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1721 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 5GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
43.5% Average
Lighting 53.6
Reflection 57
Parallax 51.9
44% 54.2 fps
MRender 49.9
Gravity 50.5
Splatting 55.8
43% 52.1 fps
Poor: 38%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 42%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
892GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 167 166 184 179 169 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Read 150
Write 166
Mixed 75.7
SusWrite 171
103% 141 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:01 98 99U5471-050.A00LF ID:01 98 99U5471-050.A00LF ID:01 98 99U5471-050.A00LF ID:01 98 99U5471-050.A00LF 66GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 34816 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
33.4% Below average
MC Read 12.3
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 8.4
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 12.3
SC Mixed 10.3
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 74.8
54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z400 Workstation Builds (Compare 3,352 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z400 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $258
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback