MSI H87M-G43 (MS-7823)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics99.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive78.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7823
MotherboardMSI H87M-G43 (MS-7823)  (all builds)
Memory17.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130923
Uptime8.4 Days
Run DateAug 12 '19 at 22:49
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4440-$99
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Memory 92.8
1-Core 85.7
2-Core 174
70% 118 Pts
4-Core 334
8-Core 342
45% 338 Pts
64-Core 318
20% 318 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
PNY(196E 119E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
99.8% Outstanding
Lighting 124
Reflection 149
Parallax 138
101% 137 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 133
Splatting 112
97% 120 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB-$251
118GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT0AB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 235 241 240 238 214 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Read 435
Write 226
Mixed 96
SusWrite 230
54% 247 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 78.2
4K Mixed 24.5
116% 43.6 MB/s
DQ Read 366
DQ Write 209
DQ Mixed 58.6
105% 211 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 85%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
115GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 256 349 409 425 428 429 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 462
Mixed 420
SusWrite 383
99% 441 MB/s
4K Read 37.1
4K Write 96.8
4K Mixed 52.9
175% 62.3 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 298
242% 342 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 114%
Great: 125%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
2.5TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 128 123 128 128 126 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Read 174
Write 170
Mixed 21.3
SusWrite 126
89% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 107%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 1TB
1TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 100 114 92 89 81 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Read 202
Write 164
Mixed 78.3
SusWrite 98.6
99% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 1.6
330% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 183%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 901GB
839GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 64 52 69 72 73 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
67.8% Good
Read 172
Write 179
Mixed 84
SusWrite 63.5
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 1.6
316% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 0420 F3-12800CL8-4GBRM 1315 BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 0420 F3-12800CL8-4GBRM 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.6% Above average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 16.4
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 14.9
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 62.5
64% 62.5 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H87M-G43 (MS-7823) Builds (Compare 183 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI H87M-G43 (MS-7823)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $199
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback