Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics12.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive47% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190628
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 12 '19 at 13:02
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Memory 73.6
1-Core 112
2-Core 221
75% 136 Pts
4-Core 453
8-Core 437
60% 445 Pts
64-Core 450
28% 450 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)
AMD(1002 15DD) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.7.5
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Lighting 14.9
Reflection 15.3
Parallax 19.2
12% 16.5 fps
MRender 11.7
Gravity 14.8
Splatting 18.7
13% 15.1 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UJ500000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 282 2.8 42 73 105 110 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
47% Average
Read 432
Write 349
Mixed 305
SusWrite 102
66% 297 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 21.6
4K Mixed 17
62% 19.2 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 79.9
DQ Mixed 31.4
41% 75.7 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 47%
Great: 55%
TOSHIBA MK2555GSXF 250GB
98GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 58 59 59 59 59 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
24.8% Poor
Read 57.1
Write 53.7
Mixed 36
SusWrite 58.5
69% 51.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
66% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GB-$67
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
79.6% Very good
MC Read 29.5
MC Write 30.1
MC Mixed 27.1
83% 28.9 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 22.4
68% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 93.3
43% 93.3 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,721 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $407
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback