AFOX AG31-M1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.43% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive43.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAFOX AG31-M1  (all builds)
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080519
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 12 '19 at 12:36
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
51% Above average
Memory 78.8
1-Core 32.7
2-Core 68.9
42% 60.1 Pts
4-Core 138
8-Core 136
18% 137 Pts
64-Core 138
8% 138 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 51%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 450
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
CLim: 880 MHz, MLim: 975 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
7.43% Terrible
Lighting 8.67
Reflection 10
Parallax 8.31
7% 9.01 fps
MRender 11.5
Gravity 8.9
Splatting 9.61
8% 10 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.43%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 128GB
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 160 123 57 58 32 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.7% Average
Read 196
Write 140
Mixed 160
SusWrite 100
33% 149 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 41.5
4K Mixed 24.6
90% 30.1 MB/s
DQ Read 29.6
DQ Write 57.7
DQ Mixed 29.4
26% 38.9 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
20.5% Poor
MC Read 7.3
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 5.6
18% 6.17 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 6.4
18% 6.23 GB/s
Latency 82.9
48% 82.9 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback