Asrock H67M-GE

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	31% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock H67M-GE (all builds)
Memory	13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110708
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Aug 12 '19 at 09:54
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319 147,533 User benchmarks, average bench 71% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 19,293,530 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	75% Very good	Memory 92.3 1-Core 98.4 2-Core 184 74% 125 Pts	4-Core 313 8-Core 459 48% 386 Pts	64-Core 472 29% 472 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 75% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	31% Below average	Lighting 38.6 Reflection 30.3 Parallax 36.8 31% 35.2 fps	MRender 38.4 Gravity 36.8 Splatting 35.7 30% 36.9 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 100 240GB-$95 9,561 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 84GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM11.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 107 114 108 105 92 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	46.5% Average	Read 229 Write 236 Mixed 250 SusWrite 121 47% 209 MB/s	4K Read 21 4K Write 42.7 4K Mixed 26 88% 29.9 MB/s	DQ Read 26.7 DQ Write 88 DQ Mixed 35.5 34% 50.1 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 46.5% Great: 83%
Seagate Desktop HDD 1TB (2013) 2,070 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 663GB free Firmware: CC92 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 102 103 101 103 103 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	60.8% Good	Read 109 Write 112 Mixed 59.8 SusWrite 102 70% 95.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 60.8% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Team Team--Elite-1333 4x4GB 441 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	49.9% Average	MC Read 17.3 MC Write 17 MC Mixed 15.4 47% 16.6 GB/s	SC Read 14.6 SC Write 17.6 SC Mixed 16.9 47% 16.4 GB/s	Latency 63.5 63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 49.9% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H67M-GE Builds (Compare 65 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H67M-GE - $104

CPU
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	14x
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	12x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	6x

GPU
RX 550AMD $79Bench 14%, 79,894 samples	6x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	5x
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples	4x

SSD
MX300 525GBCrucial $150Bench 86%, 105,037 samples	5x
Chronos 240GBMushkin $99Bench 72%, 690 samples	2x
535 Series 240GBIntel $200Bench 79%, 9,142 samples	2x

RAM
M378B5273DH0-CH9 4x4GBSamsungBench 49%, 2,942 samples	2x
RipjawsZ DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 62%, 1,961 samples	2x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 47% - Average

Total price: $579

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16