Asus Crosshair IV Formula

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive77.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Crosshair IV Formula  (all builds)
Memory6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121009
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 11 '19 at 18:58
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240
AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
65.8% Good
Memory 94.6
1-Core 56.2
2-Core 113
57% 87.8 Pts
4-Core 203
8-Core 301
31% 252 Pts
64-Core 306
19% 306 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6850
Gigabyte(1458 21F8) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 18.2
Reflection 14.2
Parallax 16.8
15% 16.4 fps
Splatting 18.2
19% 18.2 fps
Poor: 11% Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$39
206GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 281 276 277 275 275 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Read 302
Write 272
Mixed 274
SusWrite 280
64% 282 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 66.8
4K Mixed 44.5
146% 48.8 MB/s
DQ Read 40.9
DQ Write 95.3
DQ Mixed 54.1
45% 63.4 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 123%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-124.A02LF 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
42.8% Average
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 8.7
MC Mixed 15.7
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 11
27% 9.3 GB/s
Latency 58.2
69% 58.2 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Crosshair IV Formula Builds (Compare 281 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair IV Formula

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $516
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback