Asus X99-PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics49.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (80%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-PRO  (all builds)
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20141016
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateOct 22 '16 at 19:04
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 80%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Memory 93.3
1-Core 97.2
2-Core 200
76% 130 Pts
4-Core 342
8-Core 606
57% 474 Pts
64-Core 789
49% 789 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399
AMD(1002 0B00) ≥ 4GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 21.19.137.1
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
49.7% Average
Lighting 61.3
Reflection 56
Parallax 73.1
50% 63.5 fps
MRender 55.4
Gravity 49
Splatting 71
49% 58.4 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$27
213GB free
Firmware: CC47 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Read 142
Write 155
Mixed 46.2
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.73
4K Mixed 0.24
76% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 320GB-$29
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC44 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 81
Write 78.4
Mixed 39.2
49% 66.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 0.85
4K Mixed 0.4
86% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 65%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB
261GB free, PID a008
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
34.7% Below average
Read 84.3
Write 81.6
Mixed 14.1
70% 60 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.25
61% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4-2400 CL16 4GB 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM 2133 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 39.1
MC Write 41.1
MC Mixed 37
112% 39.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 18.4
SC Mixed 20.4
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 61.4
65% 61.4 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 101%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-PRO Builds (Compare 371 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-PRO - $320

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $1,100
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback