Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X530FN_S530FN

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics3.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X530FN_S530FN  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X530FN
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181101
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 10 '19 at 17:42
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU2%
CPU Throttled 90%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8565U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Memory 74.9
1-Core 142
2-Core 264
87% 160 Pts
4-Core 497
8-Core 605
71% 551 Pts
64-Core 614
38% 614 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Asus(1043 1C0E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6287
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
3.19% Terrible
Lighting 0.03
Reflection 15
Parallax 7.91
0% 7.66 fps
MRender 8.67
Gravity 7.33
Splatting 16.2
9% 10.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.19%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SN8W256G1102 256GB
196GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X6106002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 191 192 191 192 188 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
63.6% Good
Read 321
Write 296
Mixed 254
SusWrite 194
60% 266 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 45.7
4K Mixed 19.2
78% 28 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 242
209% 310 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 92%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: JU0C0J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 139 129 131 136 128 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Read 136
Write 143
Mixed 50.7
SusWrite 132
84% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.6
204% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
37.9% Below average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 11.1
37% 12.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 12
SC Mixed 9.9
32% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 90.6
44% 90.6 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X530FN_S530FN Builds (Compare 325 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X530FN_S530FN

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback