Asus P8H61-M LE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics18.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8H61-M LE  (all builds)
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110303
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateAug 10 '19 at 12:49
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2120T-$60
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
61.2% Good
Memory 92.3
1-Core 65.3
2-Core 112
58% 89.9 Pts
4-Core 178
8-Core 178
24% 178 Pts
64-Core 179
11% 179 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Nvidia(10DE 1401) 2GB
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 431.60
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
18.7% Very poor
Lighting 23.9
Reflection 22.5
Parallax 21.2
20% 22.5 fps
MRender 24.9
Gravity 20.9
Splatting 18.2
17% 21.3 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$65
239GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 80 84 64 78 49 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
47.8% Average
Read 96.9
Write 96.5
Mixed 61.2
SusWrite 69.3
60% 81 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 58%
Generic- SD/MMC 537GB
8GB free, PID 0701
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.6 8.9 9 8.8 8 8.3 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
4.86% Terrible
Read 15.5
Write 6.5
Mixed 5.3
SusWrite 8.1
11% 8.85 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
13% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.86%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
49.8% Average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 16.1
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 14.3
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 63.4
63% 63.4 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61-M LE Builds (Compare 1,014 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LE - $134

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $211
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback