Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 23% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (78%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom N2600 2,255 User benchmarks, average bench 22% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	24.4% Poor	Memory 45.6 1-Core 6.9 2-Core 13.6 18% 22 Pts	4-Core 21.5 8-Core 21.9 3% 21.7 Pts	64-Core 22.8 1% 22.8 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 24.4% Great: 25%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 3600 1,010 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Acer(1025 061F) Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 8.14.8.1075 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.43% Terrible	Lighting 0.8 Reflection 0.5 Parallax 0.34 1% 0.55 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.43% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 99GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 102 105 104 105 105 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	37.7% Below average	Read 202 Write 114 Mixed 137 SusWrite 103 31% 139 MB/s	4K Read 16.1 4K Write 17.2 4K Mixed 17.3 56% 16.9 MB/s	DQ Read 148 DQ Write 116 DQ Mixed 134 100% 133 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 37.7% Great: 134%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F3-8500CL7-4GBSQ DDR3 1x4GB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 533 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	10.8% Very poor	MC Read 4.2 MC Write 3.2 MC Mixed 3 10% 3.47 GB/s	SC Read 2 SC Write 3.3 SC Mixed 2.8 8% 2.7 GB/s	Latency 178 22% 178 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 10.8% Great: 21%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
Atom N2600IntelBench 22%, 2,255 samples	1x

GPU
Graphics Media Accelerator 3600IntelBench 0%, 1,010 samples	1x

RAM
NT2GC64B88B0NS-CG 1x2GBNanyaBench 17%, 1,374 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16