Gigabyte GA-F2A55M-DS2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 16.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics6.76% is a very low 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A55M-DS2  (all builds)
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130626
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateAug 09 '19 at 18:24
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD A4-4000 APU-$37
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
1-Core 56.7
2-Core 90.5
36% 73.6 Pts
4-Core 89.6
8-Core 89.6
12% 89.6 Pts
64-Core 49.5
3% 49.5 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 18%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Zotac(19DA 730B) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.64
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
6.76% Terrible
Lighting 26.7
Reflection 20.3
Parallax 29.9
7% 25.6 fps
MRender 23.1
Gravity 21.8
Splatting 16.5
6% 20.5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.76%
Great: 7%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$22
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 34 29 46 61 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
24.4% Poor
Read 40
Write 61.2
Mixed 38.2
SusWrite 44.9
34% 46.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.4
88% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - RAM benchmark error
Poor: 17% Great: 30%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GA-F2A55M-DS2 Builds (Compare 1,381 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A55M-DS2 - $75

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 29% - Poor Total price: $305
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $70
Intel Core i5-9600K $225Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $275Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $105
Intel Core i7-9700K $350Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super) $429Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $799SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $64Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback