HP Compaq Presario CQ71 Notebook PC

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 39% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	HP Compaq Presario CQ71 Notebook PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 306C
Memory	2.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20101221
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 09 '19 at 11:02
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T6600 8,673 User benchmarks, average bench 35% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	39.7% Below average	Memory 69.7 1-Core 31.4 2-Core 61.9 37% 54.3 Pts	4-Core 59.9 8-Core 58.4 8% 59.2 Pts	64-Core 60 4% 60 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 39.7% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce G 103M 727 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 306C) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	0.72% Terrible	Lighting 0.73 Reflection 1.5 Parallax 0.22 1% 0.82 fps	MRender 2.14 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 1 1% 1.21 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.72% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$25 42,924 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 68GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS900612 SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 171 51 53 51 50 MB/s Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	47.2% Average	Read 251 Write 182 Mixed 198 SusWrite 97.6 41% 182 MB/s	4K Read 19.1 4K Write 46.4 4K Mixed 20.7 80% 28.7 MB/s	DQ Read 157 DQ Write 148 DQ Mixed 136 107% 147 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 47.2% Great: 87%
Seagate Portable 1TB 33 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 48GB free, PID 2330 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 19 19 19 18 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	15.7% Very poor	Read 32.6 Write 9.5 Mixed 20.1 SusWrite 18.6 25% 20.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 107% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 15.7% Great: 56%
ASMT 2105 1TB 948 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 31GB free, PID 5136 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 19 19 19 18 18 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	11.7% Very poor	Read 25.9 Write 20.6 Mixed 17 SusWrite 18.9 27% 20.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 63% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.7% Great: 82%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	15% Very poor	MC Read 5.4 MC Write 3.6 MC Mixed 4.2 13% 4.4 GB/s	SC Read 4.8 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 4.6 13% 4.43 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 15% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq Presario CQ71 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Presario CQ71 Notebook PC

CPU
Pentium T4300IntelBench 34%, 6,462 samples	7x
Pentium T4200Intel $99Bench 34%, 5,474 samples	6x
Celeron Dual Core T3100IntelBench 34%, 976 samples	5x

GPU
Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset FamilyIntelBench 0%, 23,924 samples	15x
GeForce G 103MNvidiaBench 1%, 727 samples	9x

SSD
CS900 120GBPNY $25Bench 69%, 42,924 samples	1x
AS340 120GBApacerBench 67%, 5,956 samples	1x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	1x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	12x
3GBUnknownBench 14%, 81,553 samples	9x
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 15% - Very poor

Total price: $25

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16