MSI B85M-E45 (MS-7817)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics20.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7817
MotherboardMSI B85M-E45 (MS-7817)  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150421
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateOct 22 '16 at 00:07
Run Duration285 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670K-$62
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Memory 88.3
1-Core 108
2-Core 216
78% 138 Pts
4-Core 419
8-Core 409
56% 414 Pts
64-Core 412
26% 412 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Gainward(10B0 11C0) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6881
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
20.1% Poor
Lighting 24
Reflection 23.2
Parallax 29.6
20% 25.6 fps
MRender 32.5
Gravity 22.4
Splatting 24.1
21% 26.3 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 240GB-$117
145GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 00.U Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
74% Very good
Read 507
Write 310
Mixed 498
98% 438 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 85
4K Mixed 10.4
101% 41.2 MB/s
DQ Read 25.9
DQ Write 256
DQ Mixed 10.3
47% 97.4 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 74%
Great: 111%
Seagate NAS HDD 4TB-$145
2.5TB free
Firmware: SC46 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
96.1% Outstanding
Read 189
Write 146
Mixed 137
118% 157 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 1.58
4K Mixed 0.19
76% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 100%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA640 2TB-$41
1.5TB free
Firmware: MK7O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 95.2
Write 73
Mixed 60.4
57% 76.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.94
4K Write 2.14
4K Mixed 0.43
126% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 83%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX4O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
49.9% Average
Read 96.7
Write 76.8
Mixed 12.9
45% 62.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.01
4K Mixed 0.22
108% 1.11 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 108%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$50
937GB free
Firmware: 0A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Read 140
Write 115
Mixed 134
98% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 2.01
4K Mixed 0.25
83% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 86%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA640 2TB-$41
875GB free
Firmware: AA10 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
66% Good
Read 121
Write 109
Mixed 101
83% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.73
4K Mixed 0.37
93% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 66%
Great: 83%
WD WD10EVDS-63N5B1 1TB
718GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 84.3
Write 60.5
Mixed 71.4
54% 72 MB/s
4K Read 0.39
4K Write 1.61
4K Mixed 0.27
76% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 57%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$71
258GB free
Firmware: A3EA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
45.2% Average
Read 75.8
Write 81.5
Mixed 75.5
58% 77.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 1.08
4K Mixed 0.3
78% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-2133C9-8GBXH 0420 F3-2133C9-8GXH 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52.6% Above average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 16.8
52% 18 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 15.9
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B85M-E45 (MS-7817) Builds (Compare 2,234 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI B85M-E45 (MS-7817) - $107

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $535
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback