Gigabyte GA-X299 DESIGNARE EX-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 117%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 125%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive266% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemGigabyte X299 DESIGNARE EX
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X299 DESIGNARE EX-CF  (all builds)
Memory57.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.6 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 08 '19 at 10:55
Run Duration402 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7820X-$375
CPU0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Memory 74.3
1-Core 137
2-Core 266
86% 159 Pts
4-Core 538
8-Core 1,073
95% 806 Pts
64-Core 1,507
93% 1,507 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
131% Outstanding
Lighting 183
Reflection 203
Parallax 194
150% 193 fps
MRender 132
Gravity 181
Splatting 126
118% 146 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 131%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$330
145GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1347 1388 1166 909 620 518 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
266% Outstanding
Read 2,132
Write 1,427
Mixed 894
SusWrite 991
302% 1,361 MB/s
4K Read 52.5
4K Write 196
4K Mixed 69.8
273% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1,260
DQ Write 401
DQ Mixed 453
433% 705 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 266%
Great: 283%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
295GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 361 362 362 363 367 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
99% Outstanding
Read 377
Write 368
Mixed 343
SusWrite 362
82% 363 MB/s
4K Read 40.9
4K Write 87.8
4K Mixed 51.4
174% 60 MB/s
DQ Read 221
DQ Write 117
DQ Mixed 157
120% 165 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 99%
Great: 133%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$145
325GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2360 2136 1111 1115 1114 1113 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
367% Outstanding
Read 2,572
Write 2,365
Mixed 1,663
SusWrite 1,492
453% 2,023 MB/s
4K Read 71.6
4K Write 228
4K Mixed 104
362% 134 MB/s
DQ Read 1424
DQ Write 1,308
DQ Mixed 1,340
1,013% 1,357 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 367%
Great: 372%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$145
287GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1519 1178 1161 1171 1170 1159 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
348% Outstanding
Read 2,551
Write 2,351
Mixed 1,684
SusWrite 1,226
437% 1,953 MB/s
4K Read 70.7
4K Write 223
4K Mixed 105
360% 133 MB/s
DQ Read 1406
DQ Write 1,292
DQ Mixed 1,338
1,007% 1345 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 348%
Great: 372%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
215GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 6,355
Write 6,734
Mixed 5,764
1,405% 6,285 MB/s
4K Read 766
4K Write 358
4K Mixed 364
1,818% 496 MB/s
DQ Read 1,534
DQ Write 1,174
DQ Mixed 1,284
979% 1,331 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 133%
Qnap Storage 5.5TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 4.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 478 458 455 468 476 435 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 49% Great: 93%
Drobo 5D 70.5TB
52TB free, PID 3444
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 286 286 285 277 270 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 158
Write 280
Mixed 210
SusWrite 282
336% 232 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 6
4K Mixed 1.6
268% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 103%
Great: 115%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2600 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
91.8% Outstanding
MC Read 29
MC Write 51.6
MC Mixed 28.8
104% 36.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 9.9
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 91.7
44% 91.7 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X299 DESIGNARE EX-CF Builds (Compare 277 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 133%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 DESIGNARE EX-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $1,654
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback