Intel H61M-S1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive45.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte H61M-S1
MotherboardIntel H61M-S1  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120112
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 21 '16 at 16:41
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User AZE-User
Background CPU 52%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$200
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
73% Very good
Memory 92.6
1-Core 48.8
2-Core 175
62% 106 Pts
4-Core 289
8-Core 446
46% 368 Pts
64-Core 457
28% 457 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 73%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7850-$174
Asus(1043 042C) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 21.19.151.3
Relative performance (0th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Lighting 17.4
Reflection 16.6
Parallax 18
14% 17.3 fps
MRender 16.9
Gravity 14.1
Splatting 20.4
14% 17.1 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Premier SP550 120GB-$45
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O123 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.2% Average
Read 254
Write 107
Mixed 84.4
32% 148 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 34.8
4K Mixed 19.7
78% 25.7 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 60.9
DQ Mixed 25.2
40% 79.5 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 91%
Samsung HN-M101MBB 1TB-$45
245GB free
Firmware: 2AR1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
32.9% Below average
Read 56.3
Write 58.1
Mixed 52.9
42% 55.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.33
4K Mixed 0.29
74% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown PSD34G13332 0702 51264V160K 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
48.6% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 15.2
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 14.1
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 62.8
64% 62.8 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-S1 Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel H61M-S1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $75
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback