Gigabyte GA-MD71-HB0-00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics53.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive162% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory224GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 224GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-MD71-HB0-00  (all builds)
Memory217.4 GB free of 224 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190610
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 08 '19 at 02:15
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 24%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 6152
CPU0, 1 CPU, 22 cores, 44 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Memory 80.4
1-Core 96
2-Core 175
68% 117 Pts
4-Core 397
8-Core 836
72% 617 Pts
64-Core 2271
140% 2271 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.7.5
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53.5% Above average
Lighting 67.2
Reflection 68.2
Parallax 81.7
55% 72.3 fps
MRender 65.5
Gravity 68.5
Splatting 55.7
51% 63.2 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Rocket NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$45
264GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM12.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1144 592 592 595 589 594 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
162% Outstanding
Read 746
Write 1,777
Mixed 766
SusWrite 684
226% 993 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 45.3
164% 61.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,105
DQ Write 695
DQ Mixed 875
659% 891 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 162%
Great: 277%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2G40DB0-CPB 14x16GB
14 of 16 slots used
224GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
99.9% Outstanding
MC Read 34.3
MC Write 52.6
MC Mixed 36.7
118% 41.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 6.8
21% 7.23 GB/s
Latency 79.7
50% 79.7 ns
Poor: 94%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 141%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback