Asus P9X79 PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics133% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive96.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
4 months ago, 4 months ago.
MotherboardAsus P9X79 PRO  (all builds)
Memory29.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120803
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 07 '19 at 08:05
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-3930K-$495
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
63.7% Good
1-Core 98
2-Core 189
68% 144 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 572
58% 458 Pts
64-Core 678
46% 678 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$650
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Lighting 536
Reflection 451
Parallax 604
141% 530 fps
MRender 401
Gravity 470
Splatting 256
134% 375 fps
Poor: 107%
This bench: 133%
Great: 133%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$224
160GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 445 440 438 424 414 408 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Read 472
Write 454
Mixed 359
SusWrite 428
96% 428 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 63.5
4K Mixed 32.9
113% 40.3 MB/s
DQ Read 390
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 352
268% 362 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 126%
WD WD6003FZBX-00K5WB0 6TB
440GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 128 128 124 129 125 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 82% Great: 138%
WD Black 6TB (2016)-$249
411GB free
Firmware: 0A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 122 121 119 123 120 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
66.7% Good
Read 111
Write 115
Mixed 64.7
SusWrite 121
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.6
180% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 121%
WD Black 6TB (2015)-$300
190GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 86 87 82 85 83 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Read 210
Write 148
Mixed 107
SusWrite 85.6
102% 138 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1.2
436% 3.43 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 121%
WD Black 6TB (2015)-$300
605GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 139 132 134 134 134 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Read 164
Write 225
Mixed 104
SusWrite 134
115% 157 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1.1
408% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 121%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$80
1TB free
Firmware: 1D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 107 107 108 108 109 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
66.7% Good
Read 124
Write 118
Mixed 83.9
SusWrite 108
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
207% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 85%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$130
1TB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 79 80 81 82 81 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
63.1% Good
Read 139
Write 132
Mixed 67.9
SusWrite 80.4
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsZ DDR3 2400 C10 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
84.4% Excellent
MC Read 35.1
MC Write 32.7
MC Mixed 30.7
94% 32.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 12.1
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 137%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical P9X79 PRO Builds (Compare 3,854 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 PRO - $374

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $1,250
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $260Crucial MX500 250GB $44
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $60
Intel Core i7-9700K $369Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback