HP 700-056

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics25.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP 700-056  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2AE0
Memory14.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131003
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateOct 21 '16 at 01:45
Run Duration85 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-6700 APU (2013 D.Ri)-$130
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Memory 76.6
1-Core 74.4
2-Core 140
58% 97 Pts
4-Core 201
8-Core 203
27% 202 Pts
64-Core 200
12% 200 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
Asus(1043 8586) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx Ver. 21.21.13.7306
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.7% Poor
Lighting 31.6
Reflection 30.5
Parallax 27.7
26% 29.9 fps
MRender 37.3
Gravity 28.8
Splatting 29.1
26% 31.8 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 28%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP34 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Read 162
Write 158
Mixed 144
116% 155 MB/s
4K Read 0.31
4K Write 1.18
4K Mixed 0.31
69% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB Kingston ACR16D3LU1KBG/4G Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G4M1 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.4% Poor
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 5.7
MC Mixed 9.7
27% 9.5 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 9
21% 7.47 GB/s
Latency 87.2
46% 87.2 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 700-056 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP 700-056

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $240
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback