HP ProLiant DL180 G5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP ProLiant DL180 G5  (all builds)
MotherboardHP ProLiant DL180 G5
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display800 x 600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8
BIOS Date20101025
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 05 '19 at 20:51
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5440
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.85 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
47.8% Average
Memory 65.6
1-Core 40.4
2-Core 81.2
40% 62.4 Pts
4-Core 163
8-Core 319
28% 241 Pts
64-Core 319
20% 319 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 160GB
117GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 7.24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 11 9.2 16 18 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
9.74% Terrible
Read 19.4
Write 12.5
Mixed 25.5
SusWrite 14.4
14% 18 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
60% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 9.74%
Great: 48%
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 8TB
4TB free
Firmware: 7.24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 11 12 12 12 13 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
62.1% Good
Read 204
Write 12.3
Mixed 21
SusWrite 12
45% 62.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
108% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 67%
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 8TB
4TB free
Firmware: 7.24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 101 105 96 92 98 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 16% Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 6 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
16.3% Very poor
MC Read 5.7
MC Write 4.6
MC Mixed 5.6
15% 5.3 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 3.5
10% 3.47 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback