Asus B85M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus B85M-E  (all builds)
Memory2.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20151109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 20 '16 at 10:04
Run Duration546 Seconds
Run User GEO-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Memory 83.1
1-Core 95.8
2-Core 195
72% 125 Pts
4-Core 372
8-Core 371
50% 372 Pts
64-Core 371
23% 371 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
Asus(1043 852D) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4174
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.21% Terrible
Lighting 1.33
Reflection 2.62
Parallax 0.47
1% 1.47 fps
MRender 2.67
Gravity 0.87
Splatting 1.83
1% 1.79 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.21%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 605ABBF2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
46.6% Average
Read 233
Write 121
Mixed 163
38% 172 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 63.9
4K Mixed 19.5
86% 33.9 MB/s
DQ Read 74.1
DQ Write 98.5
DQ Mixed 29.2
38% 67.3 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 73%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$30
459GB free
Firmware: HP64 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
69.9% Good
Read 124
Write 120
Mixed 88.1
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.71
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.56
126% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR256X64D3U1333C9 1315 CT51264BA160BJ.C8F 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
37.4% Below average
MC Read 12.9
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 11.1
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 12.2
SC Mixed 10.8
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 75.1
53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B85M-E Builds (Compare 2,957 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B85M-E - $106

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $343
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback