Asus MAXIMUS V FORMULA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics31.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS V FORMULA  (all builds)
Memory7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121221
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateAug 04 '19 at 21:47
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 82%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
56.9% Above average
Memory 76.4
1-Core 84.4
2-Core 114
58% 91.7 Pts
4-Core 206
8-Core 278
31% 242 Pts
64-Core 334
21% 334 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7950-$290
Sapphire(174B 3000) 3GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.2.2
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
31.2% Below average
Lighting 40.3
Reflection 29.3
Parallax 50.1
33% 39.9 fps
MRender 28
Gravity 37.5
Splatting 36.2
28% 33.9 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 32%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.28.20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 116 115 117 119 117 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46.9% Average
Read 281
Write 124
Mixed 172
SusWrite 117
38% 174 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 42.8
4K Mixed 19.9
71% 25.9 MB/s
DQ Read 159
DQ Write 136
DQ Mixed 90.1
83% 128 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 82%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 1TB
200GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 91 96 100 92 98 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
96% Outstanding
Read 238
Write 197
Mixed 75.3
SusWrite 95.3
110% 152 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 1
308% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 96%
Great: 184%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 1TB
693GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 94 94 101 94 96 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
91% Outstanding
Read 220
Write 186
Mixed 57.8
SusWrite 95.5
102% 140 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.1
398% 3.5 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 91%
Great: 184%
Hitachi HTS541616J9SA00 160GB
32GB free, PID 110c
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 22 22 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Read 23.3
Write 21.3
Mixed 13.5
SusWrite 21.3
26% 19.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
52% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ares DDR3 1600 C8 3x4GB
3 of 4 slots used
12GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
37.7% Below average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 12.2
38% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 8.3
24% 8.3 GB/s
Latency 87.5
46% 87.5 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS V FORMULA Builds (Compare 710 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS V FORMULA - $349

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $724
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback