Asus PRIME Z270-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics88% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive49.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z270-A  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180315
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 04 '19 at 06:10
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600K-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 5.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 96.2
1-Core 168
2-Core 336
108% 200 Pts
4-Core 645
8-Core 626
85% 635 Pts
64-Core 630
39% 630 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 104%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2202 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
88% Excellent
Lighting 109
Reflection 119
Parallax 102
89% 110 fps
MRender 105
Gravity 102
Splatting 105
86% 104 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 88%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
168GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 46 108 81 18 64 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 451
Write 401
Mixed 16.5
SusWrite 111
54% 245 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 10.8
4K Mixed 1
44% 12.2 MB/s
DQ Read 236
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 1.2
79% 187 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 100%
Intenso Sata III 240GB
79GB free
Firmware: 5AB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 54 53 52 52 52 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
91.8% Outstanding
Read 439
Write 354
Mixed 355
SusWrite 82.4
69% 308 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 51.1
178% 67.8 MB/s
DQ Read 321
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 249
204% 291 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 90%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
337GB free
Firmware: 1U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 98 99 99 99 99 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 97
Write 96.7
Mixed 35.8
SusWrite 98.7
60% 82.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
53.9% Above average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 15.3
50% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 17.7
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 53.3
75% 53.3 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z270-A Builds (Compare 8,430 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z270-A - $159

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $827
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback