Intel E5 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

Performance Results


Gaming 55% Yacht	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 50% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	62.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	43.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Intel E5 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset (all builds)
Memory	12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20170508
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 04 '19 at 05:33
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2-$635 10,921 User benchmarks, average bench 76% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	79.5% Very good	Memory 90.8 1-Core 96 2-Core 190 74% 126 Pts	4-Core 367 8-Core 677 62% 522 Pts	64-Core 821 51% 821 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 79.5% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 590-$200 122,060 User benchmarks, average bench 57% XFX(1682 9587) CLim: 1580 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.7.5 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	62.3% Good	Lighting 78.5 Reflection 80.2 Parallax 98.9 64% 85.9 fps	MRender 76.5 Gravity 79.2 Splatting 64 59% 73.2 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 62.3% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB 44,528 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 725GB free (System drive) Firmware: UH5100RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 277 172 98 148 108 130 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	43.7% Average	Read 405 Write 356 Mixed 290 SusWrite 155 67% 302 MB/s	4K Read 16.4 4K Write 34.8 4K Mixed 10.8 57% 20.7 MB/s	DQ Read 35.4 DQ Write 14.9 DQ Mixed 11.8 12% 20.7 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 58%
Samsung HD642JJ 640GB-$70 13,060 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 124GB free Firmware: 1AA01113 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 92 91 92 92 92 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	58.2% Above average	Read 110 Write 109 Mixed 59.5 SusWrite 91.9 68% 92.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.7 144% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata DDR3 1600 4x4GB 256 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	87.4% Excellent	MC Read 36.5 MC Write 33 MC Mixed 32.1 97% 33.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 14.6 SC Mixed 12.8 40% 13.9 GB/s	Latency 66.1 60% 66.1 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 87.4% Great: 86%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical E5 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel E5 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

CPU
Xeon E5-2665 0IntelBench 67%, 1,061 samples	2x
Xeon E5-2660 0IntelBench 63%, 1,318 samples	1x
Xeon E5-1650 v2Intel $635Bench 76%, 10,921 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce 8500 GTNvidiaBench 1%, 4,580 samples	1x
GTX 660-TiNvidia $362Bench 26%, 42,960 samples	1x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	1x

SSD
SSDNow UV400 240GBKingston $89Bench 71%, 105,079 samples	1x
M667 120G 120GBShinediskBench 56%, 237 samples	1x
SU630 480GBAdataBench 67%, 31,107 samples	1x

RAM
1x8GBDimm6_ManufacturerBench 25%, 7 samples	2x
HMT151R7TFR4C 4x4GBHynixBench 66%, 190 samples	1x
36JSZF51272PZ 4x4GBMicronBench 66%, 485 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 10% - Terrible

Total price: $89

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $125	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16