Acer TravelMate 2410

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2.5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 2.5GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemAcer TravelMate 2410  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Morar
Memory1 GB free of 2.5 GB @ 0 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20050728
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 03 '19 at 12:11
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron M processor 1.50GHz
U1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
23.3% Poor
Memory 44.7
1-Core 13.9
2-Core 8.9
19% 22.5 Pts
4-Core 13.7
8-Core 14.1
2% 13.9 Pts
64-Core 14
1% 14 Pts
Poor: 10%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 27%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD600UE-22KVT0 60GB
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 09.07D09
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 17 17 19 18 18 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Read 19.3
Write 15.6
Mixed 13
SusWrite 17.4
12% 16.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
87% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 20%
ST950032 5AS 500GB
420GB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 23 23 23 23 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Read 29.8
Write 22.3
Mixed 20.4
SusWrite 23.1
31% 23.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
63% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2GB
null MHz
2048, 512 MB
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
6.83% Terrible
MC Read 2.3
MC Write 1.9
MC Mixed 1.6
6% 1.93 GB/s
SC Read 1.5
SC Write 2.1
SC Mixed 1.6
5% 1.73 GB/s
Latency 182
22% 182 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.83%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback